United States v. Jody Myesha Orso
275 F.3d 1190, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10731, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 13390, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 27294, 2001 WL 1658786
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 28, 2001·No. 99-50328·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinions
Order; Concurrence by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Dissent by Judge TROTT
ORDER
A sua sponte call for full court en banc rehearing was made by a member of the Court. The full court was advised of the call. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of full court en banc reconsideration. See Fed. R.App. P. 35; Ninth Cir. R. 35-3.
The sua sponte call for full court en banc rehearing is, accordingly, REJECTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Jody Myesha Orso, 275 F.3d 1190, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10731, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 13390, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 27294, 2001 WL 1658786 (9th Cir. 2001).
275 F.3d 1190 (United States v. Jody Myesha Orso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. $186,416.00 in U.S. Currency
527 F. Supp. 2d 1103 (C.D. California, 2007)
State v. Seibert
93 S.W.3d 700 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2002)
People v. Storm
52 P.3d 52 (California Supreme Court, 2002)
Jackson v. Litscher
194 F. Supp. 2d 849 (E.D. Wisconsin, 2002)
United States v. Jody Myesha Orso
275 F.3d 1190 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)