United States v. Jimenez

329 F. App'x 503
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 30, 2009·No. No. 09-6624·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Jimenez appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking a reduction in his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jimenez, No. 5:01-cr-30058-sgw-[504]*504mfu-6 (W.D.Va. March 26, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jimenez, 329 F. App'x 503 (4th Cir. 2009).

329 F. App'x 503 (United States v. Jimenez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related