United States v. Jesus Trevino-Celaya

Eighth Circuit

United States v. Jesus Trevino-Celaya

36 F. App'x 225

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided June 5, 2002·No. 02-1137·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jesus Trevino-Celaya appeals the sentence imposed by the district court 1 upon remand for resentencing, arguing that the court should have departed downward from the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range. Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we affirm the judgment. See U.S.S.G. §§ 5H1.6, 5K2.19; United States v. King, 280 F.3d 886, 889 (8th Cir.2002); United States v. Maldonado, 242 F.3d 1, 4-5 (1st Cir.2001).

1

. The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jesus Trevino-Celaya appeals the sentence imposed by the district court 1 upon remand for resentencing, arguing that the court should have departed downward from the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range. Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we affirm the judgment. See U.S.S.G. §§ 5H1.6, 5K2.19; United States v. King, 280 F.3d 886, 889 (8th Cir.2002); United States v. Maldonado, 242 F.3d 1, 4-5 (1st Cir.2001).

1

. The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

United States v. Jesus Trevino-Celaya, 36 F. App'x 225 (8th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

36 F. App'x 225 (United States v. Jesus Trevino-Celaya) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related