United States v. Jesus Trevino-Celaya

Eighth Circuit

United States v. Jesus Trevino-Celaya

36 F. App'x 225

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJune 5, 2002

Docket02-1137

StatusUnpublished

This text of 36 F. App'x 225 (United States v. Jesus Trevino-Celaya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Jesus Trevino-Celaya, 36 F. App'x 225 (8th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jesus Trevino-Celaya appeals the sentence imposed by the district court 1 upon remand for resentencing, arguing that the court should have departed downward from the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range. Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we affirm the judgment. See U.S.S.G. §§ 5H1.6, 5K2.19; United States v. King, 280 F.3d 886, 889 (8th Cir.2002); United States v. Maldonado, 242 F.3d 1, 4-5 (1st Cir.2001).

1

. The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jesus Trevino-Celaya appeals the sentence imposed by the district court 1 upon remand for resentencing, arguing that the court should have departed downward from the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range. Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we affirm the judgment. See U.S.S.G. §§ 5H1.6, 5K2.19; United States v. King, 280 F.3d 886, 889 (8th Cir.2002); United States v. Maldonado, 242 F.3d 1, 4-5 (1st Cir.2001).

1

. The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 F. App'x 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jesus-trevino-celaya-ca8-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack