United States v. Jerrold Hammer
This text of 459 F. App'x 584 (United States v. Jerrold Hammer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jerrold Hammer appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a reduction of his revocation sentence. We agree with the court that Hammer was not eligible for a reduction. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, comment. (n.5(A)) (2011); United States v. Morales, 590 F.3d 1049, 1052-53 (9th Cir.2010); United States v. Fontenot, 583 F.3d 743, 744-45 (10th Cir.2009); United States v. Forman, 553 F.3d 585, 588-89 (7th Cir.2009) (per curiam). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
. The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
459 F. App'x 584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jerrold-hammer-ca8-2012.