United States v. Jerrell Thomas
This text of 600 F. App'x 175 (United States v. Jerrell Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Jerrell Antonio Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion in which Thomas sought a reduction in his sentence based on Amendments 750 and 782 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Thomas, No. 2:94-cr-00069-RGD-1 (E.D.Va. Nov. 13, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
600 F. App'x 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jerrell-thomas-ca4-2015.