United States v. Jerrell Thomas

600 F. App'x 175
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 28, 2015
Docket14-7775
StatusUnpublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 600 F. App'x 175 (United States v. Jerrell Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jerrell Thomas, 600 F. App'x 175 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerrell Antonio Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion in which Thomas sought a reduction in his sentence based on Amendments 750 and 782 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Thomas, No. 2:94-cr-00069-RGD-1 (E.D.Va. Nov. 13, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
600 F. App'x 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jerrell-thomas-ca4-2015.