United States v. Jerrell Bowman

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: December 2, 2025
• Docket: 25-6701
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6701 Doc: 6 Filed: 12/02/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-6701

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JERRELL TITO BOWMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:19-cr-00045-MR-WCM-1)

Submitted: November 25, 2025 Decided: December 2, 2025

Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerrell Tito Bowman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6701 Doc: 6 Filed: 12/02/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Jerrell Tito Bowman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We review the district

court’s ruling on a motion for compassionate release for abuse of discretion. United States

v. Bethea, 54 F.4th 826, 831 (4th Cir. 2022). Upon review, we discern no abuse of

discretion in the district court’s determination that, under the pertinent 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

sentencing factors, compassionate release was not warranted. See United States v. Kibble,

992 F.3d 326, 329-31 (4th Cir. 2021) (providing standard of review and outlining steps for

evaluating compassionate release motions). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

order. United States v. Bowman, No. 1:19-cr-00045-MR-WCM-1 (W.D.N.C. July 23,

2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED