United States v. Jermaine Arrington
This text of 515 F. App'x 629 (United States v. Jermaine Arrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jermaine Arrington appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) sentence-reduction motion based on the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (FSA). We conclude that Arrington was not entitled to a reduction, as his Guidelines sentencing range was calculated based on his unlawful possession of a firearm, see U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1, which was not affected by any provision of the FSA. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (court may reduce prison term of defendant who has been sentenced based on sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by Sentencing Commission); United States v. Tolliver, 570 F.3d 1062, 1066-67 (8th Cir. 2009) (§ 3582(c)(2) allows sentence reduction only when amendment lowers applicable Guidelines range).
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.
. The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
515 F. App'x 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jermaine-arrington-ca8-2013.