United States v. Jenkins
This text of 227 F. App'x 709 (United States v. Jenkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Wayne Neal Jenkins appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his 360-month sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
Jenkins contends that United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), applies retroactively on collateral review and entitles him to relief. These contentions are foreclosed by this court’s decision in United States v. Cruz, 423 F.3d 1119, 1120-21 (9th Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S. Ct. 1181, 163 L.Ed.2d 1138 (2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
227 F. App'x 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jenkins-ca9-2007.