United States v. Jenkins

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Jenkins

512 F. App'x 319

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 28, 2013·No. No. 12-7795·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Lee Jenkins appeals from the district court’s margin order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the court’s order denying his motion for a show cause hearing and transport. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Lee Jenkins appeals from the district court’s margin order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the court’s order denying his motion for a show cause hearing and transport. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Jenkins, 512 F. App'x 319 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

512 F. App'x 319 (United States v. Jenkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related