United States v. Jenkins

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7210

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LUTHER JENKINS, IV, a/k/a Luther Jenkins,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:99-cr-00021-MR-1)

Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 3, 2010

Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Luther Jenkins, IV, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Luther Jenkins, IV, appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). ∗ We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Jenkins, No. 3:99-cr-

00021-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. June 16, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗ The district court’s order also denies other motions filed by Jenkins, but Jenkins’ informal brief challenged only the denial of the § 3582(c) motion. “The Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal brief.” 4th Cir. R. 34(b).