United States v. Jeffries
This text of 437 F. App'x 243 (United States v. Jeffries) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Reginald Dewayne Jeffries seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion to amend his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion and motion to supplement his motion to amend as well as his subsequent Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. [244]*244§ 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Jeffries seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appeal-able interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
437 F. App'x 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jeffries-ca4-2011.