United States v. Jeffries

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 9, 2010·No. 10-6419·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6419

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DEWAYNE REGINALD JEFFRIES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:07-cr-00056-MR-1)

Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 9, 2010

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dewayne Reginald Jeffries, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dewayne Reginald Jeffries appeals the district court’s

order denying his mandamus petition and motion for judicial

notice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See United States v. Jeffries, No. 1:07-cr-

00056-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 4, 2010). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jeffries, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Jeffries (United States v. Jeffries) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.