United States v. Jeffries
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6419
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DEWAYNE REGINALD JEFFRIES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:07-cr-00056-MR-1)
Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 9, 2010
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dewayne Reginald Jeffries, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Dewayne Reginald Jeffries appeals the district court’s
order denying his mandamus petition and motion for judicial
notice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See United States v. Jeffries, No. 1:07-cr-
00056-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 4, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Jeffries (United States v. Jeffries) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.