United States v. Javier Fuentes-Rodriguez

935 F.3d 627
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 26, 2019·No. 15-40740·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Javier Fuentes-Rodriguez appeals his sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States following deportation and having been previously convicted of an aggravated felony. He argues that his prior conviction under Texas Penal Code § 22.01(a)(1) and (b)(2) does not qualify as a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 16 and therefore is not an aggravated felony for purposes of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b)(2) and U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C).

Fuentes-Rodriguez's argument is foreclosed by United States v. Gracia-Cantu , 920 F.3d 252 , 254 (5th Cir. 2019), petition for cert. filed (June 25, 2019) (18-1593). Gracia-Cantu held that a prior conviction for Assault-Family Violence under Texas Penal Code § 22.01(a)(1) and (b)(2) fell within 18 U.S.C. § 16 (a), thereby qualifying as a crime of violence and an aggravated felony for purposes of § 1326(b)(2) and § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C). 920 F.3d at 254 . Gracia-Cantu relied on this court's en banc decision in United States v. Reyes-Contreras , 910 F.3d 169 , 183 (5th Cir. 2018) (en banc) (rejecting a "directness of force" requirement for a crime of violence).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Javier Fuentes-Rodriguez, 935 F.3d 627 (5th Cir. 2019).

935 F.3d 627 (United States v. Javier Fuentes-Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Fuentes-Rodriguez
22 F.4th 504 (Fifth Circuit, 2022)