United States v. Jasmine Allen

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 17, 2012·No. 12-10717·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 12-10717 Date Filed: 07/17/2012 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________

No. 12-10717 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________

D.C. Docket No. 3:06-cr-00289-VMC-MCR-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JASMINE ALLEN,

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________

(July 17, 2012)

Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Case: 12-10717 Date Filed: 07/17/2012 Page: 2 of 2

Rosemary Cakmis, appointed counsel for Jasmine Allen in this appeal from

the denial of Allen’s motion for a sentence reduction, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2), has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant

and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18

L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Allen’s motion is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jasmine Allen, (11th Cir. 2012).

United States v. Jasmine Allen (United States v. Jasmine Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)