United States v. Jangula
This text of 473 F. App'x 595 (United States v. Jangula) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
In these consolidated cases, Randy James Jangula appeals from the consecutive 12-month sentences imposed following revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Jangula contends that his aggregate sentence is substantively unreasonable. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the sentencing factors enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), the sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
473 F. App'x 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jangula-ca9-2012.