United States v. Jangula
This text of 407 F. App'x 234 (United States v. Jangula) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
In these consolidated cases, Randy James Jangula appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Jangula contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. In light of the totality of the circumstances, the district court’s sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc). Moreover, the district court did not procedurally err. See id.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
407 F. App'x 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jangula-ca9-2011.