United States v. James Taylor
This text of United States v. James Taylor (United States v. James Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7918
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMES DARREN TAYLOR,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:94-cr-00040-FDW-4)
Submitted: January 17, 2013 Decided: January 23, 2013
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Darren Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
James Darren Taylor appeals the district court’s order
granting his motion for a sentence reduction filed pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by
not considering the current statutory sentence for Taylor’s
offense. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th
Cir. 2004) (motion under § 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion
of the district court”). Thus, we affirm the district court’s
order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. James Taylor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-taylor-ca4-2013.