United States v. James Neely, Sr.

672 F. App'x 445
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 27, 2016
Docket16-50472 Summary Calendar
StatusUnpublished

This text of 672 F. App'x 445 (United States v. James Neely, Sr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. James Neely, Sr., 672 F. App'x 445 (5th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

James Bently Neely, Sr., federal prisoner # 24634-079, has moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. Under § 3582(c)(2), a district court may reduce a defendant’s sentence if he was sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that subsequently was lowered by the Sentencing Commission. Amendment 782 did not reduce Neely’s guidelines sentencing range, and so he was ineligible for a sentencing reduction. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(a)(2) & comment. (n.1(A)); United States v. Bowman, 632 F.3d 906, 910-11 (5th Cir. 2011).

Neely’s appeal does not present a non-frivolous issue and has not been brought in good faith. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). The motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.24 (5th Cir. 1997); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Bowman
632 F.3d 906 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)
Howard v. King
707 F.2d 215 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
672 F. App'x 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-neely-sr-ca5-2016.