United States v. James Harold Appleton

927 F.2d 605, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 7511, 1991 WL 23501
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 25, 1991
Docket91-5072
StatusUnpublished

This text of 927 F.2d 605 (United States v. James Harold Appleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. James Harold Appleton, 927 F.2d 605, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 7511, 1991 WL 23501 (6th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

927 F.2d 605

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James Harold APPLETON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-5072.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 25, 1991.

M.D.Tenn., 88-00097, Nixon, J.

M.D.Tenn.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Before KENNEDY and NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judges, and JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

This appeal has been referred to this panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

A review of the documents before the court indicates that the district court denied defendant's motion for appointment of counsel by ruling entered December 18, 1990. Defendant appealed from that ruling on January 7, 1991.

A ruling denying appointment of counsel is not appealable. Hodges v. Department of Corrections, 895 F.2d 1360, 1361-62 (11th Cir.1990) (per curiam); Holt v. Ford, 862 F.2d 850, 851 (11th Cir.1989) (en banc); Henry v. City of Detroit Manpower Dep't, 763 F.2d 757, 764 (6th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1036 (1985).

It is ORDERED that the appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robert Holt v. J. Paul Ford, Warden
862 F.2d 850 (Eleventh Circuit, 1989)
Hodges v. Department of Corrections
895 F.2d 1360 (Eleventh Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
927 F.2d 605, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 7511, 1991 WL 23501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-harold-appleton-ca6-1991.