United States v. James Earl Matthews
254 F.3d 825, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 5936, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4830, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 12389, 2001 WL 668914
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 12, 2001·No. 98-10499·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. James Earl Matthews, 254 F.3d 825, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 5936, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4830, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 12389, 2001 WL 668914 (9th Cir. 2001).
254 F.3d 825 (United States v. James Earl Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Carlos Chavaria-Angel, AKA Guadalupe Garcia, AKA Guadalupe Chevarria-Garcia
323 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Shannon Wayne Tighe
266 F.3d 1187 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)