United States v. James Earl Matthews
226 F.3d 1075, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 10181, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7697, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 23204
This text of 226 F.3d 1075 (United States v. James Earl Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. James Earl Matthews, 226 F.3d 1075, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 10181, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7697, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 23204 (9th Cir. 2000).
Opinion
226 F.3d 1075 (9th Cir. 2000)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JAMES EARL MATTHEWS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 98-10499
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Argued and Submitted February 14, 2000--San Francisco, California
Filed September 14, 2000
NOTE: SEE AMENDED OPINION AT 240 F.3d 806.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. James Earl Matthews
240 F.3d 806 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Matthews
226 F.3d 1075 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
226 F.3d 1075, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 10181, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7697, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 23204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-earl-matthews-ca9-2000.