United States v. James Andrew Colbert and Michael Beryl Reese

468 F.2d 199, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9255
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 1, 1972
Docket71-2097
StatusPublished

This text of 468 F.2d 199 (United States v. James Andrew Colbert and Michael Beryl Reese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. James Andrew Colbert and Michael Beryl Reese, 468 F.2d 199, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9255 (5th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

468 F.2d 199

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James Andrew COLBERT and Michael Beryl Reese, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 71-2097.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

June 1, 1972.
Rehearing En Banc Granted June 1, 1972.

Jack Drake, Drake & Knowles, University, Ala., for defendants-appellants.

Wayman G. Sherrer, U. S. Atty., Melton Alexander, L. Scott Atkins, John S. Salter, Asst. U. S. Attys., Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE, WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, INGRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

The Court on its own motion having determined to have this case, 454 F.2d 801, reheard en banc,

It is ordered that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

On Court's Motion

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, TUTTLE, WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, INGRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

The Court on its own motion having determined to have this case reheard en banc,

It is ordered that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
468 F.2d 199, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-andrew-colbert-and-michael-beryl-reese-ca5-1972.