United States v. Jackson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jackson. Read the opinion of the Court — 390 F.3d 393
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 14, 2007·No. 04-11401·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-11401 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

COURTNEY LADON JACKSON, also known as Courtney Jackson,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas No. 3:03-CR-331-1-G --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Courtney Ladon Jackson has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jackson has

filed a response. Our independent review of the record,

counsel’s brief, and Jackson’s response discloses that there are

no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and this APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jackson, (5th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Jackson (United States v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)