United States v. Jackson
This text of 84 F. App'x 436 (United States v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Christopher O’Neal Jackson appeals his sentence following his conviction of possession with intent to distribute a substance containing cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Jackson maintains that the evidence the district court used in determining the sentence lacked the sufficient indicia of reliability required by U.S.S.G. § 6A1.3.
The evidence considered in determining Jackson’s sentence had sufficient indicia of reliability to support its probable accuracy. See United States v. Davis, 76 F.3d 82, 84 (5th Cir.1996). Jackson has not met his burden of showing that the information upon which the district court relied is materially untrue. See id.
AFFIRMED
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 F. App'x 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jackson-ca5-2004.