United States v. Jackson
This text of United States v. Jackson (United States v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-40669 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANDREW JACKSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:99-CR-104-1 -------------------- May 16, 2001
Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Andrew Jackson (“Jackson”) was convicted of assaulting an
inmate resulting in serious bodily injury, in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 113(a)(6). He argues that insufficient evidence existed
to support his conviction because the Government failed to prove
beyond a reasonable doubt that he did not act in self-defense.
He also argues that the district court erred by excusing a juror
for cause.
This court has reviewed the record and the briefs of the
parties. It concludes that sufficient evidence existed to
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-40669 -2-
support Jackson’s conviction. See United States v. Garcia, 995
F.2d 556, 561 (5th Cir. 1993). It also concludes that the
district court did not abuse its discretion by excusing the juror
for cause. See United States v. Gonzalez-Balderas, 11 F.3d 1218,
1222 (5th Cir. 1994). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jackson-ca5-2001.