United States v. Jackson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jackson. Read the opinion of the Court — 105 F.3d 655
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 17, 1999·No. 98-41173·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-41173 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANGELO JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:98-CR-16-2 - - - - - - - - - -

June 17, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The federal public defender (FPD) appointed to represent

Angelo Jackson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Jackson has responded arguing that the district court erred in

denying his motion to suppress and in sentencing him based on

crack cocaine. Our independent review of counsel’s brief,

Jackson’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 98-41173 -2-

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jackson, (5th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Jackson (United States v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)