United States v. Jackson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jackson. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 F.3d 583
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 27, 1997·No. 96-20188·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20188 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEONARD NEAL JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-94-CR-182-1 - - - - - - - - - - February 24, 1997

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Leonard Neal Jackson appeals from his conviction by guilty

plea of bribery of a public official. Jackson contends that the

district court erred by denying his motion to withdraw his guilty

plea.

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties

and we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion

by denying Jackson’s motion to withdraw his plea. United States

v. Carr, 740 F.2d 339, 344 (5th Cir. 1984). Accordingly, we

affirm Jackson’s conviction.

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-20188 - 2 -

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jackson, (5th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Jackson (United States v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Michael Carr
740 F.2d 339 (Fifth Circuit, 1984)