United States v. Jackson

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Jackson

692 F. App'x 688

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 27, 2017·No. No. 17-6220, No. 17-6221·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Andrew Charles Jackson appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions to reduce sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jackson, Nos. 3:00-cr-00046-JPB-RWT-1; 3:00-cr-00006-JPB-RWT-1, 2017 WL 662115 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 9, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Andrew Charles Jackson appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions to reduce sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jackson, Nos. 3:00-cr-00046-JPB-RWT-1; 3:00-cr-00006-JPB-RWT-1, 2017 WL 662115 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 9, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Jackson, 692 F. App'x 688 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

692 F. App'x 688 (United States v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related