United States v. Jackson

53 F. App'x 698
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 3, 2003
Docket02-7386
StatusUnpublished

This text of 53 F. App'x 698 (United States v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jackson, 53 F. App'x 698 (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tracy Glenn Jackson seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Jackson has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Jackson, Nos. CR-00-192; CA-02-11-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 F. App'x 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jackson-ca4-2003.