United States v. Jackson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 13, 1998·No. 97-6313·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 97-6313

MICHAEL JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-125, CA-96-1029)

Submitted: July 28, 1998

Decided: August 13, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Michael Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing with preju- dice his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), as barred by the one-year limitation period imposed by 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1998). Appellant's conviction became final in May 1995, and he filed his federal habeas motion in Decem- ber 1996. Because Appellant's conviction became final prior to the implementation of the one-year limitation period, Appellant had until April 23, 1997 in which to file his habeas motion. See Brown v. Angelone, ___ F.3d ___, 1998 WL 389030 (4th Cir. July 14, 1998) (Nos. 96-7173, 96-7208). Thus, Appellant's motion was not time barred. Accordingly, we grant a certificate of appealability on this issue, vacate the district court's order, and remand for further pro- ceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jackson, (4th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Jackson (United States v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related