United States v. Jackson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 25, 1997·No. 96-6900·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6900

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TERRELL DEON JACKSON, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-93-262-A, CA-96-375-AM)

Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 25, 1997

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrell Deon Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jackson, Nos. CR-93-262-A; CA-96-375-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 27, 1996). See also United States v. Mitchell, 104 F.3d 649, 653-54 (4th Cir. 1997) (holding that a gun located in a

vehicle does not have to be immediately accessible to be considered

"carried" under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) (1994)). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jackson, (4th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Jackson (United States v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Wayne Morris Mitchell
104 F.3d 649 (Fourth Circuit, 1997)