United States v. Jackson
This text of United States v. Jackson (United States v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6900
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TERRELL DEON JACKSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-93-262-A, CA-96-375-AM)
Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 25, 1997
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terrell Deon Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-
pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jackson, Nos. CR-93-262-A; CA-96-375-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 27, 1996). See also United States v. Mitchell, 104 F.3d 649, 653-54 (4th Cir. 1997) (holding that a gun located in a
vehicle does not have to be immediately accessible to be considered
"carried" under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) (1994)). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jackson-ca4-1997.