United States v. Jackson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7441
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
OTIS JACKSON, II,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-280, CA-97-389)
Submitted: March 24, 1998 Decided: April 20, 1998
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Otis Jackson, II, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying
his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)
and his motion for reconsideraton of that order. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recom-
mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jackson, Nos. CR-90-280; CA-97-389 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 9, 1997). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Jackson (United States v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.