United States v. Jackson

148 F. App'x 818
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jackson. Read the opinion of the Court — 506 F.3d 1358
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided September 2, 2005·No. No. 05-11376; D.C. Docket No. 90-00138-CR-WS·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Cedric Bernard Jackson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Jackson because, in her view, Jackson’s appeal has no merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the revocation of Jackson’s supervised release and 24-month sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jackson, 148 F. App'x 818 (11th Cir. 2005).

148 F. App'x 818 (United States v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)