United States v. Jackson

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Jackson

154 F. App'x 193

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided November 14, 2005·No. No. 04-10715; D.C. Docket No. 03-00250-CR-T-30-MSS·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert C. Port, appointed counsel for Andrew Steven Jackson in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw, accompanied by a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and appellant’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Robert C. Port, appointed counsel for Andrew Steven Jackson in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw, accompanied by a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and appellant’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Jackson, 154 F. App'x 193 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

154 F. App'x 193 (United States v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related