United States v. Ingram

424 F. App'x 252

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Herman Lee Ingram appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ingram, No. 3:05-cr-00361-HEH-1 (E.D.Va. Dec. 21, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED