United States v. Ingram

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Ingram

178 F. App'x 206

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 26, 2006·No. 06-6273·Unpublished

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Walter Louis Ingram appeals a district court’s order denying his motion for re-sentencing and to correct erroneous information in the presentence investigation report. The district court was without jurisdiction to do either. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials *207 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Walter Louis Ingram appeals a district court’s order denying his motion for re-sentencing and to correct erroneous information in the presentence investigation report. The district court was without jurisdiction to do either. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials *207 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Ingram, 178 F. App'x 206 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

178 F. App'x 206 (United States v. Ingram) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.