United States v. Ingram

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 17, 2003
• Docket: 02-7691
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7691

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WALTER LOUIS INGRAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA- 92-116-JFM)

Submitted: June 12, 2003 Decided: June 17, 2003

Before LUTTIG and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.*

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter Louis Ingram, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

* This case was decided by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). PER CURIAM:

Walter Louis Ingram appeals from the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See United States v. Ingram, No. CA-92-116-JFM

(D. Md. Sept. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED