United States v. Ijaz

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 16, 2010·No. 10-6489·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6489

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MOHAMMAD IJAZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge. (1:07-cr-00227-MJG-2)

Submitted: October 20, 2010 Decided: November 16, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mohammad Ijaz, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Michael Cunningham, Christine Manuelian, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mohammad Ijaz appeals the district court’s revised

order denying several motions, including his motion for return

of $249,132.06 in forfeited currency. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Ijaz, No. 1:07-cr-00227-MJG-2 (D. Md. Mar. 19, 2010). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ijaz, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Ijaz (United States v. Ijaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.