United States v. Ijaz

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Ijaz

401 F. App'x 781

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 16, 2010

DocketNo. 10-6489

StatusPublished

This text of 401 F. App'x 781 (United States v. Ijaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Ijaz, 401 F. App'x 781 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mohammad Ijaz appeals the district court’s revised order denying several motions, including his motion for return of $249,132.06 in forfeited currency. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ijaz, No. 1:07-cr-00227-MJG-2 (D.Md. Mar. 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mohammad Ijaz appeals the district court’s revised order denying several motions, including his motion for return of $249,132.06 in forfeited currency. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ijaz, No. 1:07-cr-00227-MJG-2 (D.Md. Mar. 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

401 F. App'x 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ijaz-ca4-2010.