United States v. Iacono

19 C.M.A. 490, 19 USCMA 490, 42 C.M.R. 92, 1970 CMA LEXIS 847, 1970 WL 7000
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided June 5, 1970·No. No. 22,905·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

l) \rden, Judge:

The appellant stands convicted of wrongfully selling twelve tablets containing LSD on June 4,1969. For conviction of an offense committed before August 1, 1969, use of evidence reflecting Article 15 disciplinary action is inadmissible for consideration during sentencing. United States v Johnson, 19 USCMA 464, 42 CMR 66 (1970). Evidence showing an unauthorized absence from his appointed place of duty and of wrongful possession of another’s identification card and liberty pass could have had an impact on the sentence given this appellant for the offense charged. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Military Review is reversed as to sentence. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy for submission to the Court of Military Review for reconsideration of the sentence.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Iacono, 19 C.M.A. 490, 19 USCMA 490, 42 C.M.R. 92, 1970 CMA LEXIS 847, 1970 WL 7000 (cma 1970).

19 C.M.A. 490 (United States v. Iacono) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Dukes
5 M.J. 71 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1978)
United States v. Cohan
20 C.M.A. 469 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1971)
United States v. Baker
20 C.M.A. 175 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)
United States v. Taylor
20 C.M.A. 93 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)
United States v. Duron
19 C.M.A. 563 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)