United States v. Hunter

26 F. Cas. 436, 1 Cranch 446
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedNovember 15, 1807
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 26 F. Cas. 436 (United States v. Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hunter, 26 F. Cas. 436, 1 Cranch 446 (circtddc 1807).

Opinion

But THE COURT

(DUCKETT, Circuit Judge, absent,)

said the witness might be sworn in all the eases but his own, inasmuch as they were not jointly indicted, nor charged simul cum, &c., and the swearing the same jury in the four cases, is but as charging four separate juries.

Mr. Jones then moved to discharge the jury from the consideration of John Hunter’s case.

But THE COURT refused.

Mr. Taylor then prayed THE COURT to instruct the jury that none of the defendants can be found guilty unless for his own assault and batteiy, and that the others cannot be found guilty as aiding and abetting John Hunter. That they ought to have been indicted simul cum, or else jointly.

But THE COURT refused, because all present aiding and abetting are principals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Piles v. Plum & Swann
2 D.C. 32 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1811)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 F. Cas. 436, 1 Cranch 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hunter-circtddc-1807.