United States v. Hunter
This text of 26 F. Cas. 436 (United States v. Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
said the witness might be sworn in all the eases but his own, inasmuch as they were not jointly indicted, nor charged simul cum, &c., and the swearing the same jury in the four cases, is but as charging four separate juries.
Mr. Jones then moved to discharge the jury from the consideration of John Hunter’s case.
But THE COURT refused.
Mr. Taylor then prayed THE COURT to instruct the jury that none of the defendants can be found guilty unless for his own assault and batteiy, and that the others cannot be found guilty as aiding and abetting John Hunter. That they ought to have been indicted simul cum, or else jointly.
But THE COURT refused, because all present aiding and abetting are principals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 F. Cas. 436, 1 Cranch 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hunter-circtddc-1807.