Piles v. Plum & Swann

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Piles v. Plum & Swann

2 D.C. 32

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedNovember 15, 1811

StatusPublished

This text of 2 D.C. 32 (Piles v. Plum & Swann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Piles v. Plum & Swann, 2 D.C. 32 (circtddc 1811).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court,

with some hesitation

(Fitzhugh, J., absent,)

permitted the defendant Swann, to be examined. See United States v. Pawling et al. in the Supreme Court of the United States, 4 Cranch, 221; Harper v. Smith, in this Court at July term, 1808, (1 Cranch, C. C. 495,) and the United States v. Hunter et al. at November term, 1807, (1 Cranch, C. C. 446,) and the United States v. Abbot, in the District Court, (not reported.) But see below, Johnston v. Chapman & Alexander.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court,

with some hesitation

(Fitzhugh, J., absent,)

permitted the defendant Swann, to be examined. See United States v. Pawling et al. in the Supreme Court of the United States, 4 Cranch, 221; Harper v. Smith, in this Court at July term, 1808, (1 Cranch, C. C. 495,) and the United States v. Hunter et al. at November term, 1807, (1 Cranch, C. C. 446,) and the United States v. Abbot, in the District Court, (not reported.) But see below, Johnston v. Chapman & Alexander.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 D.C. 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piles-v-plum-swann-circtddc-1811.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack