United States v. Hunnell

18 C.M.A. 584, 18 USCMA 584, 40 C.M.R. 296, 1969 CMA LEXIS 709, 1969 WL 6085
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided September 19, 1969·No. No. 22,147·Published

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

The scrutiny given the providence of appellant’s plea of guilty to absence without leave, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 886, is not so different from that found in United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247, as to require a different result. Accordingly, the decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hunnell, 18 C.M.A. 584, 18 USCMA 584, 40 C.M.R. 296, 1969 CMA LEXIS 709, 1969 WL 6085 (cma 1969).

18 C.M.A. 584 (United States v. Hunnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Care
18 C.M.A. 535 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1969)