United States v. Hunnell

18 C.M.A. 584, 18 USCMA 584, 40 C.M.R. 296, 1969 CMA LEXIS 709, 1969 WL 6085
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedSeptember 19, 1969
DocketNo. 22,147
StatusPublished

This text of 18 C.M.A. 584 (United States v. Hunnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hunnell, 18 C.M.A. 584, 18 USCMA 584, 40 C.M.R. 296, 1969 CMA LEXIS 709, 1969 WL 6085 (cma 1969).

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

The scrutiny given the providence of appellant’s plea of guilty to absence without leave, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 886, is not so different from that found in United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247, as to require a different result. Accordingly, the decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Care
18 C.M.A. 535 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 C.M.A. 584, 18 USCMA 584, 40 C.M.R. 296, 1969 CMA LEXIS 709, 1969 WL 6085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hunnell-cma-1969.