United States v. Humberto Rivera-Moreno
This text of United States v. Humberto Rivera-Moreno (United States v. Humberto Rivera-Moreno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 24-1969 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Humberto Rivera-Moreno, also known as Beto, also known as Erik Moctezuma, also known as Erik Moctezuma-Espindola, also known as Eduardo Rivera-Moreno, also known as Jose Chavez
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha ____________
Submitted: January 14, 2025 Filed: January 22, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________
Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM. Humberto Rivera-Moreno appeals after the district court1 denied his motion seeking a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). After carefully reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not give any weight--much less significant weight--to an improper or irrelevant factor, or commit a clear error of judgment in weighing appropriate factors. See United States v. Tollefson, 853 F.3d 481, 485 (8th Cir. 2017) (reviewing district court’s decision whether to grant eligible defendant’s § 3582(c)(2) motion for an abuse of discretion); United States v. Denton, 821 F.3d 1012, 1013 (8th Cir. 2016) (explaining abuse-of-discretion standard); United States v. Granados, 830 F.3d 840, 842-43 (8th Cir. 2016) (per curiam) (district court has substantial latitude to weigh 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and does not abuse its discretion by denying § 3582(c)(2) motion after weighing aggravating factors more heavily than post-sentencing rehabilitation); United States v. Boyd, 819 F.3d 1054, 1056 (8th Cir. 2016) (per curiam) (post-sentencing prison violations were “clearly relevant” to district court’s exercise of its discretion).
Accordingly, we affirm. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Brian C. Buescher, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Humberto Rivera-Moreno, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-humberto-rivera-moreno-ca8-2025.