United States v. Hughes

7 F. App'x 668
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 28, 2001
DocketNo. 00-30259; D.C. No. CR-00-00129-BJR
StatusPublished

This text of 7 F. App'x 668 (United States v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hughes, 7 F. App'x 668 (9th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM2

Willie J. Hughes appeals the 12 month sentence imposed following his conviction for five counts of Aiding and Abetting in the Preparation of False and Fraudulent Income Tax Returns in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2). We dismiss.

Hughes contends that the district court erred by determining that it lacked the discretion to grant him a downward departure for diminished capacity pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K2.13. The record, however, is devoid of support for this contention.

We conclude that the district court determined that it had the discretion to grant a downward departure but chose not do so. See United States v. Jackson, 986 F.2d 312, 314 (9th Cir.1993) (providing that when it is not otherwise in dispute, a district court’s silence regarding its authority to depart is not sufficient to indicate that the court believed it lacked the power to depart). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s discretionary decision not to depart downward. United States v. Tucker, 133 F.3d 1208, 1219 (9th Cir.1998).3

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Manuel Larry Jackson
986 F.2d 312 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Walter R. Tucker, III
133 F.3d 1208 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 F. App'x 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hughes-ca9-2001.