United States v. Hughes

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1143

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BARBARA HUGHES,

Claimant – Appellant,

and

DAVID KELLY, JR., a/k/a Panama,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:07-cr-00014-RAJ-TEM-1)

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 24, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barbara Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Barbara Hughes appeals the district court’s order

denying her motion for reconsideration of its forfeiture order.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Hughes, No. 2:07-cr-00014-RAJ-TEM-1

(E.D. Va. Jan. 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED