United States v. Huggins

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Huggins. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 F. App'x 650
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 18, 2002·No. 02-6295·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6295

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ALVIN JUSTIN HUGGINS, a/k/a Buddy,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-95-51-H, CA-01-70-4-H)

Submitted: June 13, 2002 Decided: June 18, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Alan Williams, KEITH A. WILLIAMS, P.A., Greenville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Alvin Justin Huggins seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West

Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Huggins, Nos. CR-

95-51-H; CA-01-70-4-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 26, 2001). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Huggins, (4th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Huggins (United States v. Huggins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related