United States v. Huggins

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Huggins

37 F. App'x 650

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 18, 2002·No. No. 02-6295·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Alvin Justin Huggins seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Huggins, Nos. CR-95-51-H; CA-01-70-4-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con[651]*651tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Alvin Justin Huggins seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Huggins, Nos. CR-95-51-H; CA-01-70-4-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con[651]*651tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

United States v. Huggins, 37 F. App'x 650 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

37 F. App'x 650 (United States v. Huggins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related