United States v. Howell

669 F. App'x 154
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 4, 2016
DocketNo. 16-6854
StatusPublished

This text of 669 F. App'x 154 (United States v. Howell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Howell, 669 F. App'x 154 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Brian Howell appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. Howell claims that the district court did not adequately explain why it declined to order a larger sentence reduction pursuant to Amendment 782. Having reviewed the record, we find that the district court sufficiently explained its rationale for the sentence it imposed. We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
669 F. App'x 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-howell-ca4-2016.