United States v. Howard
This text of 668 F. App'x 55 (United States v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
George Edward Howard appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to [56]*56reconsider its denial of a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) and Amendment 782 of the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s refusal to reconsider. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234-36 (4th Cir. 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
668 F. App'x 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-howard-ca4-2016.