United States v. Howard

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Howard

668 F. App'x 55

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 23, 2016·No. No. 16-6380·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

George Edward Howard appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to [56] reconsider its denial of a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) and Amendment 782 of the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s refusal to reconsider. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234-36 (4th Cir. 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

George Edward Howard appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to [56] reconsider its denial of a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) and Amendment 782 of the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s refusal to reconsider. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234-36 (4th Cir. 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Howard, 668 F. App'x 55 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

668 F. App'x 55 (United States v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related